DMD Simcyp

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirayama, H.
Right arrow Articles by Pang, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirayama, H.
Right arrow Articles by Pang, K. S.

Estimations of intestinal and liver first-pass metabolism in vivo. Studies on gentisamide conjugation in the rat

H Hirayama, J Morgado, I Gasinska and KS Pang

Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

In this paper a method is introduced to study both intestinal and liver metabolism in the intact rat by cannulation of the jugular vein, carotid artery, pyloric vein (into the portal vein), and bladder. In this preparation, the rat received an initial dose followed by iv (I) and then intraportal (II) infusions. Gentisamide (2,5- dihydroxybenzamide, GAM) was used since it forms monosulfate (GAM-2S and GAM-5S) and monoglucuronide (GAM-5G) conjugates, metabolites that are not further metabolized. After administration of tracer amounts of radiolabeled gentisamide ([3H]GAM), the concentration ratio of [3H]GAM in the portal vein and carotid artery [CPV(I)/CA(I)] during iv infusion, and the ratio of carotid artery concentrations for intraportal to iv infusions [CA(II)/CA(I)] provided the intestine and liver availabilities, respectively; the corresponding extraction ratios for the intestine and liver were 0.26 to 0.27 and 0.37 to 0.41. Similar concentration ratios for the conjugates during iv administration [CPV(I)/CA(I)] showed intestine formation of GAM-5G, and to a lesser extent, GAM-2S, since the ratios exceeded unity; GAM-5S was not formed by the intestine since the ratio was unchanged. The ratio of the carotid arterial concentrations for intraportal to iv infusions that revealed hepatic formation showed similar values (1.77 and 1.71) for GAM-2S and GAM-5S, but variable (decreases and increases) GAM-5G values, whose mean value approximated unity. All findings were consistent with data obtained from the perfused rat liver preparation and the combined perfusion of rat intestine-liver preparation, where GAM-5G and GAM-2S were shown to be formed by the intestine, and where sulfation was the preferred pathway in the liver.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Volume 18, Issue 5, pp. 588-594, 09/01/1990
Copyright © 1990 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.